Welcome to Paediatric Pearls!

This site is aimed at supporting the continuing professional development (CPD) of health professionals working with children.

It is put together by a UK general paediatric consultant ably assisted and kept on her toes by bright-eyed, enthusiastic registrars (paediatricians in training) who ask questions the majority of which she can’t possibly answer without consulting the evidence-base.

The Paediatric Pearls blog including monthly PDFs is here

Disclaimer: We work very hard to check the evidence for all the topics we write about but, like anyone else, we can make mistakes and medical evidence is continually updated.  I take no responsibility for any decisions you may make by blindly following anything written here.  We offer it all as food for thought only; feel free to add your comments.


November/December 2016 newsletter uploaded!

 

November/December

2016 edition

pp_may

Nov/Dec 2016: 2 months in one because life got a bit hectic for a while.  HbA1c units this month, first part of safeguarding information on gangs, phenytoin warning, last bit of orthopaedic feet and links to a couple of good courses on paediatric ECGs and learning about urgent care. 

 Please leave comments, questions or suggestions on the blog.

Whipps Cross staff looking for local guidelines please click here. You have to be logged on to a Barts Health computer.

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify.This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.
Page last updated: 4th December 2016

44 thoughts on “Welcome to Paediatric Pearls!

    1. I don’t know! I’ve never asked them. Maybe I should. I think you can always get CPD points for reflection on your learning if you think that Paediatric Pearls falls into that sort of category.
      Julia

    2. Hi

      A colleague has pointed out your site to me and this query specifically. While I’m replying a while after the post was submitted, I hope this is helpful.

      RCPCH recognises a range of learning activities as CPD. Providing that the individual has learnt something from reading this site and has reflected on its usefulness for their practice, it counts as CPD. This type of learning tends to fall in the Personal CPD category. More info is in our CPD guidelines on the website http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/cpd-resources

      Hope this is helpful

      Sarah

      (Revalidation and CPD Manager at RCPCH)

  1. Hello all,

    Julia let me know about this helpful site so that I could update you on the new integrated drugs and alcohol service for the London Borough of Waltham Forest, called Lifeline Waltham Forest. It’s an over 18 service, but we use a whole family approach which means that as well as working with families and carers, we also involve the family in the recovery and change process. We also run parenting support groups and family outings.

    The service opened on 1st August 2015 and the Borough’s other drugs and alcohol services closed down. However, the 722 Young People’s Substance Misuse Service is still running and can be contacted on 0300 555 1158.

    There’s a lot more information on our website – http://www.lifelinewalthamforest.org.uk – or do give the service a call if you would like to find out more on 020 3826 9600.

    Thanks, Jenny

  2. Hi Julia,
    It has been many years since we met at an Enuresis conference and you offered to post my enuresis program on your site. Since then I have gone on to win the BJN Nurse of the year for my enuresis work.

    I have continued to work on my Asthma project (The POCKETFLOW) https://sites.google.com/site/pocketflowspacer/
    I am looking for opportunities to move this project forward. Please let me know if you or anyone you know might be interested in having a chat.

    Cheers

    Paul

  3. Hi Julia,
    excellent October article- as usual. I wanted to ask you about the role of monteleukast in the management of recurrent viral induced wheeze in infants and young children. We are seeing this increasingly prescribed for the prevention of deterioration- very often patients are asked to take it at the onset on their symptoms. It seems to be very effective in controlling symptoms. Is this something that could be prescribed more widely in children who are having recurrent viral wheeze, who are requiring prednisolone and having to attend A&E often?.

    many thanks

    Sabul (gp)

    1. Thanks Sabul. I am going to ask one of my newly appointed colleagues at Royal London to answer this for you as he is running a study into just this topic and will give you a better background and summary of the evidence than I can. Watch this space…

      1. Please see November 2014′s newsletter for comments on the recently published WAIT study which looks at the use of montelukast in viral induced wheezers. Not really a magic pill (granules actually) but some of us still cling on to the hope that it might prove to be in certain children with the right genes.

  4. Dear Julia,
    I was lovely to meet with you. Thank you for hosting our Barnet pathways. I look forward to sharing more.
    Your website is fantastic- I will definitely be spreading the word. Pls could I be added to your mailing list too.
    Kind regards

  5. Dear Julia- thaks for the excellent, useful resource! Using it a lot on my paeds ED placement- could I please be added to your mailing list?
    Thanks,

    Jon

  6. Hi Dr. Julia
    First of all, I would like to congratulate you for the fantastic web page, which I find it very useful and informative, in addition to that it is very important to discuss, reflect and bring to light very important scientific issues that might positively affect our future management and treatment for various diseases and you just opened this window.
    I am involved in research, specially metabolism, and cardiovascular related physiology and pathology. From my reading through various official medical governmental web pages (Local and international), medical text books (Local and international) medical education (Medical Schools), among doctors, scientists and even patients, I noticed that they all strongly believe that type 1 diabetics have zero insulin levels in their body or blood, and that because their beta cells in the pancreas are destroyed by either viruses or antibodies or chemicals or autoimmune or any other unknown reasons. I quote her some examples for such statements with their sources references (In type 1 diabetes, the pancreas (a small gland behind the stomach) does not produce any insulin. Insulin is a hormone that regulates blood glucose levels.- http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Diabetes-type1/Pages/Introduction.aspx), another example (Type 1 diabetes develops when the body’s immune system attacks and destroys the cells that produce insulin. As a result the body is unable to produce insulin and this leads to increased blood glucose levels, which in turn can cause serious damage to all organ systems in the body.- http://www.diabetes.org.uk/Guide-to-diabetes/Type-1-diabetes/). I have previously done research (abroad) on more than 132 diabetic patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes and my results showed that no patient had zero insulin level (normal range 3 to 27 international units), only one case showed insulin levels of 2 iu; some type 1 patients had low C peptides with normal insulin levels and high blood glucose levels and others had normal C peptide with normal insulin levels and high blood glucose levels. As you know that insulin is a hormone secreted by pancreas and other tissues directly into the blood, similarly thyroid hormones are secreted by thyroid glands directly into the blood, and from our medical practice we normally check for example thyroid hormones levels and if they low we top up and if high we lower them to levels with medications, and we use this procedure for other hormones except for insulin. My question is this: is there any reason why we do not check insulin levels and treat accordingly? And my second question is: is there any scientific paper, published or unpublished to support, confirm or prove the above mentioned statements by diabetes.org.uk and nhs.uk, that zero insulin were found in all type 1 diabetic patients or at least one, two or more diabetic patients?

    Kind regards

    Dr. Tarig Arbab

  7. Hi Julia,
    as Gps we see lots of cases of viral wheeze. I would like some clarification on the use of prednisolone in such cases. In most cases we issue ventolin (unless bronchiolitis is suspected), but in those cases where the patient is working a bit harder we also issue prednisolone. I am not sure what the evidence says about the duration of treatment with steroids. I have seen anything from 3 days to 5 days treatment. How many days should we prescribe prednisolone for ? is it age dependant?

    Just another question on bronchiolitic wheeze. is any role of atrovent?

    thank you for your comment

    Sabul- Gp

    1. I’ll tell you what I think – and we’ll see how many people disagree! There was a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2009 that concluded that in pre-school children with mild-to-moderate wheezing associated with a viral infection, prednisolone was not superior to placebo. Primary outcome: duration of hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes: amount of β –agonist used, time to return to normal activities, number of readmissions in a month. The authors suggested we do NOT give oral prednisolone routinely to this group of patients. NEJM 2009;360(4):329-338. However if you look closely at the cohort they studied I think this same conclusion is not necessarily true for the wheezy preschoolers who have an obvious atopic history (eczema, allergies, family history of hay fever, asthma etc.). At Whipps we tend to try and hold off steroids if we are likely to send this age group home from the ED but give them if they are ill enough to be admitted or if we think they are atopic and likely to benefit from them. The BTS guideline on asthma (there is not one on “viral induced wheeze”) offers a range of days of treatment (3-5 days) (http://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/guidelines/asthma-guidelines.aspx). Our policy is generally 5 days if they have been admitted though I personally sometimes give a 3 day course as a sort of half way house if I am not convinced they really need them anyway. I don’t think it is age dependant.

      You are correct that there is no place for prednisolone in bronchiolitis (http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign91.pdf
      ). Atrovent may be worth trying in the slightly older babies where you are beginning to wonder whether this is actually viral induced wheeze rather than bronchiolitis. Have a listen after you’ve given it and if it hasn’t made a difference it’s not worth continuing with it. Same goes if you are trying salbutamol in the older babies; they may not have enough of the right receptors yet to respond. If it doesn’t have an effect the first time you give it, it is not worth continuing with it.

      Clear as mud! Medicine as an art form….

  8. Hi Julia
    I think your newsletters are great and very helpful!

    I was doing a search through past editions but didn’t come across anything unless I’ve missed it. I was wondering if there’s any tips for for childhood obesity and how we should be managing in GP and when we should be referring etc.

    1. Thanks for your message. Obesity is on my list of topics to cover but I keep side-stepping it – partly because it won’t all fit into one of my tiny text boxes and partly because I am not sure if secondary care could cope with the potential number of referrals. http://www.mendcentral.org run group courses for children of different ages (from age 2) and their families in some local leisure centres which incorporate sport and healthy eating advice. The website’s home page has a “find your nearest Mend” tool and a quick BMI calculator. I have had some good feedback from patients about Mend. Viner, White et al published a guide to paediatric obesity in Archives of Disease in Childhood earlier this year which explains when to refer to secondary care (Assessment of childhood obesity in secondary care: OSCA consensus statement Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2012;97:98-105) and when investigations might be appropriate. Hope this helps; I will get round to summarising the paper at some point…

  9. I have stumbled upon your wonderful site recently, and have found it generally informative. I’m a nurse in paeds a&e. Just a little niggle, and only because in a previous life I did renal for a few years.
    In your june 2012 update about BP the guidelines state that the cuff should cover at least 40% of the circumfrence of the arm. This is ambiguous at best and is based on old adult guidelines that the width of the cuff should cover at least 40% of the circumfrence of the upper arm. It is much better to focus on the length of the bladder, and ideally this should cover the circumfrence of the arm- we have all had short fat children to do blood pressure on, and a bigger cuff would give a far more accurate BP than a shorter cuff would. If not 100% then it should be greater than 80%- there are a wide range of sizes available for our “growing” paediatric population.
    Perhaps it would be good also to mention that any abnormal reading on an automated reader should be repeated manually after 5 minutes. every year children are refered unnecessarily to a nephrology consultant because of high blood pressure which is found to be normal using correctly sized equipment.

    1. Thank you for your helpful clarification. Blood pressure is notoriously badly taken in children – if at all. I take it myself manually if the automated reading is high and will concentrate harder on the length of the bladder from now on!
      Julia

  10. Hi Julia.
    This website is amazing! Thank you for putting so much work and time into it.
    I’m not sure how I ended up finding it during a totally unrelated search but I’m really glad I did!
    Hope to see you later this week at PECSIG.
    Thanks
    Laila
    PS: please add me to your mailing list. Thanks.

  11. Hi, thanks for the effort that goes into the website, it is greatly appreciated. Please could I be added to the mailing list for alerts when monthly news letter is published,

    regards, Nicola

  12. Hi,
    This website is brilliant. I’m not entirely sure how I found it!

    If there’s a mailing list around for people who receive the monthly digests or reminders to check here I’d love to be added on it…I always forget to check back on wesites regularly!

    Thank you!

    Charlotte

    1. Thank you for your kind comment. I will add you to my mailing list for the newsletters. You could follow us on Twitter too if you are into that sort of thing. I don’t tweet very often but do tend to say something when I have just uploaded a newsletter.
      Julia

  13. Dear Julia

    Hope u r keeping well. Very useful PDF to refresh knowledge.
    Varus deformities in Rickets takes longer time to revert back to normal, so in such cases do we still have to rule out Blounts disease in children > 3yrs , who was previously diagnosed as vit D deficiency ??

    Cheers
    Radha

    1. Good to hear from you Radha. I hope India is suiting you. Interesting to see the pathology is similar in some ways! I am going to ask one of the paediatric orthopaedic surgeons at the Royal London Hospital to answer your question. It seems unfair that children should have both pathologies but if you are in an area of very high rickets prevalence then may be it is possible.

      (Comment is with reference to the January 2012 PDF available from the right of the screen.)

      1. It would be very bad luck for a child to have both rickets and Blount’s disease. Assuming the Ricketts is being treated, improvement in the defmormity can be expected although it may be slow. In contrast, Blounts tibia vara usually gets progressively worse. Perhaps observe the child for 3 or 4 months and see if they are getting better or worse. Radiologically the two conditions are very different and so an xray will almost certainly be able to differentiate the 2 conditions. If the varus deformity is secondary to ricketts, I would follow the child up until the limb alignment has corrected. If it is Blounts and getting worse, then referral to a paediatric orthopaedic surgeon would be appropriate.

        Mr Matthew Barry
        Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, Royal London Hospital

        1. the neurodevelopment series is a very useful document for practitioners .esp useful to compare with normal children.
          thank u n Mr Barry for info on blounts vs rickets .
          great work !!

  14. Hi Julia,
    Its always a pleasure reading articles from Paediatric Pearls. I find them very informative. I have a question. I have heard that oral prednisolone can also be used for croup (1mg/kg- if I remeber correctly). I have never seen this used. In the AE dept I worked in the past- we’ve always used dexamethasone. I am not sure how true this is. I would be gratfeul for your comment.

    many thanks
    Dr S Hussain
    Gp

    1. The BNFc suggests that 1-2mg/kg prednisolone is appropriate to give in croup “prior to sending the child to hospital”. This would be easier to give/prescribe I think in general practice than the oral dexamethasone which comes in very large bottles. Either wears off after a while so our practice in the ED is to observe them for 2-3 hours post corticosteroid administration and if they present in the evening we tend to admit them overnight. The Cochrane work suggests that dexamethasone is less likely to lead to readmission than prednisolone. As far as corticosteroids in croup go, I’ve only ever used dexamethasone (and nebulised budesonide years ago which works but is more expensive than dex and no better).
      Julia
      (discussion around http://www.paediatricpearls.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/November-2011.pdf)

  15. Julia

    adorable work
    I love the links provided through the newsletters,great learning opportunity
    thank u for taking the pain in summarising the lengthy nice guidelines

    Radha

  16. Dear Julia

    I came upon your website whilst researching minor head injuries in children

    it is a really excellent site and i have now added the site to my favourites

    Articles seem practical evidenced , relevant and easily digestible

    keep up the good work

    kr

    Judy davis

  17. Julia, this is awesome. Thanks for getting in touch. It will become a prominent link on gp-training.net. Do keep going, and developing! Let me know if I can be of any help. Do get back in touch so we can converse.
    Best wishes
    Brad

  18. Dear Julia,
    It was very pleasant to stumble upon this website,it is a very useful tool.I don’t know if you remember me but I was your SHO in Whipps Cross Hospital when you were registrar ,some where in 2000-2001 and have special memories of those days.I am now an attending Peaditrician in the US now .I will visit this site and stay in touch.This is really good.

    Warm Regards
    William Chinery

  19. Julia

    Following our telephone conversation a few weeks ago about a patient, I have been looking at the website regularly. Really informative and practical advice. I’ll spread the word amongst my colleagues.

    Regards

    Amish

  20. Julia this is great, i find it better than a book in some ways, i hope you can continue with this & make a large e-library, i will recommend this to my own GP in enfield who was asking me questions yesterday when i visited him for my own problem. Also i like the idea that we can access this free from anywhere in the world. I’m sure with time you will find ways to make it even more user friendly. Well done.
    Salman.

  21. Julia, I think the website is fabulous. It’s informative, interesting and fun! Well done! I look forward to keeping updated with pearls. Brilliant!

    1. Thanks Anna and thank you for your professional dietetic input into the text box on infant formulas in October’s Paediatric Pearls. I didn’t know parents can use Nesquik as flavouring for the amino acid or extensively hydrolysed milks as an alternative to vanilla essence drops but I see there’s a whole discussion on Mumsnet on how to flavour your baby’s Nutramigen or Neocate!

  22. Hi Julia

    I am impressed with your effort and persistence. This is nice.

    You may consider how to directt he reader to the topics that they want to read.
    When I go to the website, I would probably want to read something that I dont know.

    Have you considered a list of keywords, which link to to specific editions?
    e.g. Tinea Capitis….’Click’ then go to the right section?

    I can see there are some cases quoted
    Have you considered put them on a section called ‘case history’ with a keyword attached to it
    e.g.
    Case history 1 – Tina capitis
    Case history 2 – Perrorbital cellulitis with complication caverous sinus thrombosis

    These could become an ‘e-library’ and who knows, you may find a nice publisher to publish it!
    Ashraf is quite keen to collect cases, get students, or SHO to write them up.
    Maybe something you can consider with the paediatricpearls.

    Well done

    John

    1. Thank you John. There is a tag cloud on the right which admittedly looks like a jumble of random words in random fonts but will actually provide the search you were suggesting. The size of the word reflects how many times it has been tagged on the site. I need to tidy that section up a bit. There is also a search function at the top right. I like the idea of case histories; they could just go into the blog bit as comments linked to a topic we’ve featured. Amutha is at the moment trying to get the SHOs involved in a “6 week check” series for the GPs so I’ll get them to do that first if I may.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>